The administration asks the Supreme Court to clarify the order that allows deportations to 3rd countries
The Trump administration requested the Supreme Court on Tuesday to clarify its order, allowing migrants deported to third countries after a federal judge in Boston said that eight migrants arrested in the African country of Djibouti are protected from immediate elimination.
In an order on Monday, the United States District Judge Brian Murphy said that the eight men in Djibouti remain protected from immediate elimination despite the ruling of the Supreme Court, referring to another order that had issued last month that was separated from the one that waiting by the Supreme Court.
This ruling required that migrants scheduled for deportation to a country other than their place of origin had the opportunity to affirm whether they face a “serious danger or death due to such deportation” and gave them a “minimum of 15 days” to try to reopen the immigration procedures that challenge their possible elimination.
The eight men in question, who were convicted of violent crimes, received removal notices from the United States to the country of East Africa of South Sudan, but after Judge Murphy blocked the attempt of the administration of deporting the group to South Sudan group without giving them a sufficient opportunity to dispute their removal, the group was disbursed in Djibouti, where they remain in a military base under perile conditions.
The Order of the Supreme Court on Monday allows the Trump administration to restart the offented removals of migrants to countries other than their own.
The general lawyer D. John Sauer, in the motion presented on Tuesday before the Supreme Court, described the ruling of Judge Murphy “an act of challenge without law” that “hits the brakes in the legal efforts of the Executive to carry out the removals of the third country.”
“This Court must immediately make it clear that the Execution Order of the District Court has no effect, and put a rapid end to continuous irreparable damage to the executive branch and its agents, which remain under a threat of contempt without foundation, since they are forced to house dangerous criminals in a military base in the Africa horn that is now in the chocolates of a regional conflict,” Sauer said.
In this file of May 11, 2017, an agent of the law passes through the ICE logo before a press conference at the headquarters of the United States immigration and customs control in Washington, DC
The Washington Post through Getty Images, File
In his motion, Sauer argued that the judge of the Order of May 21 Murphy issued to protect men in Djibouti from imminent extraction “is not a separate court order” and that “it simply applied the original judicial order of April 18” that the Supreme Court remained.
“The court order of the District Court has created an unstable and dangerous situation in the military base in Djibouti, a situation that has become even more dangerous given the current events in the Middle East,” Sauer argued.
